The documentary begins with two equally shocking scenes designed to put the audience on edge: in one, an animal rights activist grabs a fur-wearing woman and beats her in the street, and in the other a series of pets are brutalized in a "shelter." It's unclear whether the first incident is staged (the second clearly isn't), but the point is obvious: whichever side of the animal rights movement you're on, Johnson is going to rub your face in the cruel extremes of your point of view. Yet the movie as a whole is less binary than this introduction implies; as the film unfolds, Johnson showcases a wide variety of perspectives on the issue, showing how even within the animal rights movement there is great disagreement and how there's plenty of hypocrisy to go around on all sides.
The most extreme and outspoken activists—and the ones who most justify the FBI's designation as terrorists—are the members of the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a group so devoted to their cause that some of them publicly endorse the murders of researchers engaged in animal testing. Johnson interviews several spokespeople for the group and provides footage from their speeches and attacks (including bombings and assaults on doctors), and he juxtaposes this material with contrary points of view regarding the importance of animal testing in curing human diseases and the parallels between ALF and the wackiest fringes of the pro-life movement. Yet before the viewer can get too comfortable, Johnson challenges these arguments with footage that indicates nothing short of extremism will stop the undeniable savagery that corporations practice, and he demonstrates that militant tactics work—a number of financial institutions stop doing business with Huntingdon Life Sciences, a company engaged in massive animal abuse, after being harassed by activists.
Johnson also implies that extremism on the activist side is a natural response to governmental abuse; why wouldn't activists move to more outrageous behavior when conventional free speech is prosecuted, as it is in the case of six animal rights proponents who are imprisoned simply for campaigning to shut down Huntingdon's animal testing facilities? What ultimately emerges from the documentary is the terror inflicted by absolutists on both sides—people who, as journalist Christopher Hitchens notes, are terrorists because of their absolute conviction that they are right, a conviction that leaves no room for tolerance or debate. This means that the villains of the piece range from the most aggressive members of the ALF on one side to the President of the United States on the other. Indeed, one of the most chilling aspects of the film is its depiction of how George W. Bush and the Department of Homeland Security deflect attention from their own failures in the "war on terror" by redefining what terror is—only an administration this out of touch with reality could make a convincing case that college kids protesting animal cruelty are a threat on a par with Osama bin Laden. In the end, this is the greatness of Your Mommy Kills Animals: that it moves beyond animal rights to consider the larger issue of how political speech of a certain persuasion is persecuted more vigorously than murder, rape, or other violent crimes. Perhaps it shouldn't come as a surprise that Johnson himself has claimed to be harassed by federal agents just for making this film, something that proves the movie's point. If a director of a relatively even-handed documentary who is far from a radical leftist (his last film as a producer, in fact, was entitled Michael Moore Hates America) is considered a threat, who's next?
No comments:
Post a Comment